Bug#315315: xserver-xfree86: accel disabled on ct69000

[amu@alum.MIT.EDU (Aaron M. Ucko)]

Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca> writes:

> I won't have a chance to try that until tomorrow, but I don't think it
> will help.  The first reason is that the XF86Config-4 man page says
> that the two forms are equivalent.  The second reason is that the

The chips(4) manpage gave me the impression that it might be
asymmetric, with the general rule being that settings for (e.g.)
NoAccel automatically translate into settings for Accel but not vice
versa; however, a bit of digging through the source tree reveals that
it is always fully symmetric and you're consequently out of luck. :-/

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger amu@monk.mit.edu (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.