On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 08:53:28PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 11:32:36AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 07:06:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > I would also hope to see an X config that did more autoconfiguration, > > > perhaps by using X --config, if that actually mostly works in newer versions > > > of X. > > It does, but it's under the X-Oz license, and last I looked, we weren't > > even 100% sure that was DFSG-compliant. > > For those following from home, here it is: http://www.x-oz.com/licenses.html Please post the entire text of the license (in plain text, not HTML, please) to debian-legal. You might title the message something like "DFSG audit of X-Oz licene wanted". License analysis needs to be carried out in the proper forum, and it's good to help out search engines (and humans). -- G. Branden Robinson | What cause deserves following if Debian GNU/Linux | its adherents must bury their branden@debian.org | opposition with lies? http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Noel O'Connor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature