[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255749: xterm: Dies with segmentation fault



severity 255749 important
retitle 255749 xterm: SEGV in XawTreeForceLayout()
tag 255749 + help upstream
thanks

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:28:19PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > So the problem was in libxaw7. After downgrading libxaw7 from
> > 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 xterm works fine.
> > 
> > Thank you, Thomas.
> 
> no problem (I think this one should be redirected to the X libraries)

Sigh.  There were no CHANGES made to libXaw7 from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 to
4.3.0.dfsg.1-5.

Nor to libXt.

Nor to libX11.

Nor to any other library.

634 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ head -n 1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4/xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
635 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ head -n 1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5/xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
636 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ diff -urN 4.3.0.dfsg.1-[45]/xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/build-tree/xc/lib/Xaw
637 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ diff -urN 4.3.0.dfsg.1-[45]/xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/build-tree/xc/lib/Xt
638 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ diff -urN 4.3.0.dfsg.1-[45]/xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/build-tree/xc/lib/X11
639 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ diff -urN 4.3.0.dfsg.1-[45]/xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/build-tree/xc/lib
640 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$

I'm starting to get tired of this "downgrading package $FOO fixed it,
therefore the bug must be in package $FOO" logic.  It's clearly not
well-correlated with reality.

(Not ranting at you, Thomas, just the cruelty of life.)

XTerm itself did get revved from #187 to #190, though:

645 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ diff -urN 4.3.0.dfsg.1-[45]/xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/build-tree/xc/programs/xterm | grep 'Patch #'
+<LI><A HREF="#xterm_190">Patch #190 - 2004/5/25 - XFree86 4.4.99.6</A>
+<LI><A HREF="#xterm_189">Patch #189 - 2004/5/16 - XFree86 4.4.99.6</A>
+<LI><A HREF="#xterm_188">Patch #188 - 2004/5/12 - XFree86 4.4.99.6</A>
 <LI><A HREF="#xterm_187">Patch #187 - 2004/4/27 - XFree86 4.4.99.4</A>
 <LI><A HREF="#xterm_186">Patch #186 - 2004/4/18 - XFree86 4.4.99.4</A>
 <LI><A HREF="#xterm_185">Patch #185 - 2004/3/3 - XFree86 4.4</A>
 <LI><A HREF="#xterm_01">Patch #1 - 1996/1/6</A>
+<H1><A NAME="xterm_190">Patch #190 - 2004/5/25 - XFree86 4.4.99.6</A></H1>
+<H1><A NAME="xterm_189">Patch #189 - 2004/5/16 - XFree86 4.4.99.6</A></H1>
+<H1><A NAME="xterm_188">Patch #188 - 2004/5/12 - XFree86 4.4.99.6</A></H1>
 <H1><A NAME="xterm_187">Patch #187 - 2004/4/27 - XFree86 4.4.99.4</A></H1>
646 branden@sisyphus:~/packages/xfree86/tmp$ 

Where do we go from here?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |      What cause deserves following if
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      its adherents must bury their
branden@debian.org                 |      opposition with lies?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |      -- Noel O'Connor

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: