On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:25:50PM -0500, Zed Pobre wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:39:52AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > So, Ben would have had to give up working on Subversion, give up working > > on the kernel, or give Larry McVoy money. > > Without commenting on the rest of the BitKeeper licensing mess, > I'd like to point out that the second option isn't quite accurate -- > Ben would only have to give up using BitKeeper to work on the kernel. > Alan Cox, for one, gets along just fine working on the kernel without > BitKeeper. Thanks for the correction. Yes, what you said is more accurate. In fact, I think that's the option Ben selected. -- G. Branden Robinson | Exercise your freedom of religion. Debian GNU/Linux | Set fire to a church of your branden@debian.org | choice. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature