Re: XSF revision 238
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 04:35, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> >>>>> In <[🔎] 20030622184015.GR5952@deadbeast.net>
> >>>>> Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
>
> >> I object to killing off the X-forked GLU package at this point for that reason
> >> and others.
>
> I think there are three points of issue related it.
>
>
> 1) We will ship libGLU or not?
>
> Perhaps, YES.
> I agree your point, currenlty We can not disable libGLU
> cleanly (described one more problem on 2).
Assuming 2) is solved, are there other reasons we can't disable it
cleanly? I'm honestly curious.
> 2) Build without BuildGLULibrary is not easy.
>
> Even if we decide libGLU will not ship, we need some more changes
> to solve problems
>
> After my roughly review, another problem is found,
> glxinfo will be built disabling GLU support without
> libGLULibrary. So, current branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/ settings
> does break glxinfo compatibility between previous release.
Does this require more changes than build-depending on libglu-dev (and
possibly some config/cf/ fiddling)?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Reply to: