[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: proposed X Strike Force commit/changelog policy



On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:31:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:49:32AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive.  The goal
> > > is to make them more useful.  My package changelogs have been doing
> > > double-duty for years because I didn't have them under revision control.
> > > Now they simply need to do what a changelog should do -- log changes.
> > 
> > That's what I meant, really. Right now, some of the changelogs (like the
> > 293-line changelog for 4.3.0-0ds4) are pretty unnavigable.
> 
> Well, I rudely purged your changelog entries from the 4.3.0/sid branch,
> so I don't see them and they don't bother me.  :)

Well, yeah. Behold, an example. :P

-- 
Daniel Stone 	     <daniel@raging.dropbear.id.au>             <dstone@kde.org>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org

Attachment: pgppexv8jklCd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: