On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:57:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:15:10AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > xlibmesa3-gl suggests that it's Mesa version 3. Which it isn't. > > Well, yes, actually I think it is: > > From: David Dawes <dawes@XFree86.Org> > To: cvs-commit@xfree86.org > Subject: CVS Update: xc (branch: ) > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:30:12 -0700 (PDT) > Message-Id: <200108171830.f7HIUCf19386@public.xfree86.org> > > CVSROOT: /home/x-cvs > Module name: xc > Changes by: dawes@public.xfree86.org. 01/08/17 11:30:12 > > xc/extras/Mesa > > Update of /home/x-cvs/xc/extras/Mesa > In directory public.xfree86.org:/home/dawes/mesa_3_4_branch/import > > Log Message: > Mesa version 3.4.2 snapshot at 20010817 > [...] > > Mesa 4 wasn't merged onto HEAD until 22 Feb 2002, and I don't think XFree86 > 4.2.1 has it. > > Corrections welcome. While you may be right, we're talking about different things. :) Marcelo was wondering why I bumped the name to xlibmesa4-* for my packages, and I pointed out that having xlibmesa3-*, for Mesa 4, would be horrifically stupid and misleading. So, while I can't fault your logic of Mesa 3 being in 4.2.1 ... ;) -- Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
Attachment:
pgpzDvyhfS3Tl.pgp
Description: PGP signature