Re: [oliver.poths@linsoft.de: XFree86 4.01]
"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > So there is no way it can be in testing.
> So it goes stable -> woody -> testing -> sid ? Which one should developers
> run?
Stable (Potato) <- Testing (Woody) <- Unstable (Sid)
You should probably be running whichever distribution your packages are
built for. For example, if you maintain a package in Potato, you should
have a Potato box lying around to compile with. If you're building a
package for Woody, and it's already in the new Woody Pool, and you don't
need for it to advance before Woody freezes, run Woody. If you're
building a bleeding-edge package that depends on XFree86 4.0.2,
glibc2.2, or some other libraries that didn't or won't make it to Woody,
Sid is just fine (and a lot more fun ;).
--
-=|JP|=- "Why, oh, why didn't I take the blue pill?"
Jon Pennington | Atipa Linux Solutions -o)
jpennington@atipa.com | http://www.atipa.com /\\
Kansas City, MO, USA | 816-595-3000 x1550 _\_V
6D04 39E0 CAE9 9ADA 2CA3 2EBE 898A 6C37 CA1E A29C
Reply to: