Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

["Thomas E. Vaughan" <vaughan@tensor.nssl.noaa.gov>]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:24:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
>> First, I looked at the logged output from X.  There was a conflict
>> between drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement
>> was "dri disabled".  Shucks.
> [...]
>> Any ideas?

In the snipped-out part of the quote, I indicated that I managed to get rid
of the drm conflict message and the "dri disabled" message by switching to
the Matrox-supplied binary-only driver.

> Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the DRI at sourceforge, the Mesa
> version is now 3.4, etc. etc.  Maybe try a bleeding edge kernel?

I have been using 2.4.0-test8 since it was released.  I suppose that I
could try a test9-preX, but has there really been much movement there with
respect to the DRI for the mga?

Thank you for your response.

-- 
Thomas E. Vaughan <thomas.vaughan@nssl.noaa.gov>
CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA