[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10



On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:51:59PM -0500, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
> First, I looked at the logged output from X.  There was a conflict between
> drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement was "dri
> disabled".  Shucks.
[...]
> Any ideas?

Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the DRI at sourceforge, the Mesa
version is now 3.4, etc. etc.  Maybe try a bleeding edge kernel?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |       If you have the slightest bit of
Debian GNU/Linux                |       intellectual integrity you cannot
branden@debian.org              |       support the government.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |       -- anonymous

Attachment: pgpO65jlrhvEP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: