On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 06:35:38PM -0400, Donnie Roberts wrote: > First, xlibgl1 which is supposed to replace Mesa. However, only libGL is > provided by xlibgl1. Either xlibgl1 should include libGLU or the Mesa > packages need to split off libGLU into a separate package. James Treacy (current Mesa maintainer) and I have agreed on the latter solution. libGLU will not be regarded as provided by the "libgl1" virtual package. > Secondly, no dri tdfx support is included in the packages. The tdfx > support depends on glide3 libraries compiled with DRI support. Yes, which is why I turned it off. XFree86 goes looking for a file, g3ext.h, which does not exist in the current glide3 release. I think it is in CVS. Therefore I am not building 3Dfx DRI support until this is remedied in the Debian packages of glide3. I've already notified the maintainer, Joseph Carter, of this. > I also tried to get dri support to work by copying the tdfx_dri.so and > libglide3 from the 4.0.1 I had compiled previously. Direct rendering > worked, but caused the X server to segfault randomly. This is the only > error message reported, from the kernel after X dies: > [drm:drm_release] *ERROR* Process 10842 dead, freeing lock for context 1 Well, that's not encouraging. I've been getting the impression that DRI/DRM are not thoroughly debugged yet. > I would like to compile the X packages myself to add tdfx support in the > meantime. Please let me know what I need to properly build the X packages, > and where to find anything not already in debian/unstable > (dpkg-shlibdeps?). What you want can't be done with the X packages yet. We're waiting on a usable libglide3. -- G. Branden Robinson | Experience should teach us to be most on Debian GNU/Linux | our guard to protect liberty when the branden@debian.org | government's purposes are beneficent. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Louis Brandeis
Attachment:
pgpKosQwzB9sg.pgp
Description: PGP signature