Hi,
I wouldn't consider having Chinese or Korean support disqualifies the this as a webfont. Actually, using Chinese web fonts without proper subsetting can result in large (2MB~) file loading, therefore it is a disadvantage.
Most Chinese and Korean websites only apply webfonts for Latin patters.
I think styling is a small part that contributes to the quality of the website. Content is the king, and we should have better content for the homepage. Yao Wei
(This email is sent from a phone; sorry for HTML email if it happens.) Am 16.06.19 um 08:58 schrieb Carsten Schoenert:...This font doesn't appear to have support for all the languages
supported by the Debian website.
This criteria from Paul is a serious requirement. Have a look at the git
tree of the webwml repository to see which languages are currently used
within the Debian websites on www.d.o
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml
Given the information I've found about the Rubik font on fontsquirrelthis font is lacking at least the support for Chinese, Hebrew andKorean. This will disqualify the font for using within the website I'd say.https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/rubik-- RegardsCarsten Schoenert
|