Hi there! On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:23:52 +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 08 nov 12, 15:00:53, Don Armstrong wrote: >> Better to just file a bug in the BTS and do all of this there with a >> form. It can even use the current www.debian.org pseudopackage with an >> appropriate usertag so it gets filtered out. Thank you for the hint, Don, I fully agree with you that using the already-established infrastructure is the way to instead of inventing the wheel again. However, I disagree with both approaches and I still think that the processing used until now is the right one: similarly to what happens for events or merchandise, sometime there is the need to discuss a bit more before adding the entry. If this means that the entry is not added right away, I am fine with that (no one is paid to do such a work). And, again, sometime such discussions are private, which means that the BTS is not suitable (RT would be, but I find it less friendly). Moreover, the advantage of having a single point of entry means that we can archive everything in one single place, exactly like it is done for the events@d.o alias. >> For example: >> >> To: submit@bugs.debian.org >> From: yourname >> Subject: Please add consultant <your name> >> >> Package: www.debian.org >> Severity: wishlist >> User: www.debian.org >> Usertags: consultants >> >> # Consultant: COUNTRYTLD >> # email checked on YYYY-MM-DD >> <p> >> <name Your Name> >> <company Your Company> >> <address Your address <country-name COUNTRYTLD>> >> <phone +1 PhoneNumber> >> <fax +1 PhoneNumber> >> <email email@example.com scramble="no"> > > This would expose the full e-mail address whether scramble is "yes" or > "no". I do not get this, since we already require a full email address and we show it in clear: <http://www.debian.org/consultants/#CH> Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpW6lHbK_4tN.pgp
Description: PGP signature