[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:38:01AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Not sure I understand: if this goes through will all material be 
> dual-licensed or it's just that everybody chooses one of the two 
> licenses and as a consequence the whole site is dual-licensed (as an 
> aggregate work)?

The former: people will need to agree to re-license their contributions
under dual MIT/GPL-2 license; in the end each contribution, as well as
the website as a whole [1], will be dual-licensed.


[1] modulo specific exceptions, like the one mentioned by Alexander
Stefano Zacchiroli     zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ......   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ......   . . o
Debian Project Leader    .......   @zack on identi.ca   .......    o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: