[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

On Mi, 18 ian 12, 13:09:21, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:38:01AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Not sure I understand: if this goes through will all material be 
> > dual-licensed or it's just that everybody chooses one of the two 
> > licenses and as a consequence the whole site is dual-licensed (as an 
> > aggregate work)?
> The former: people will need to agree to re-license their contributions
> under dual MIT/GPL-2 license; in the end each contribution, as well as
> the website as a whole [1], will be dual-licensed.

Thanks for clarifying :)

Did you consider the possibility that some contributors[1] may object to 
allowing *also* MIT/Expat? Maybe I'm being too cautious, but some people 
might consider MIT/Expat too liberal. 

[1] No, not me, I have no problem to relicense my meager contributions 
with MIT/Expat only ;)

Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: