Le 2010-05-11 02:27, Frank Lin PIAT a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 14:20 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:On 2010-05-09 08:51, Steve McIntyre wrote:On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 11:33:08AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:The"edit war" comment from Paul is entirely clear there - the wiki should be a collaborative project and simply reverting over and over again to force *your* changes to a page that somebody else has already worked on is simply not a valid way to work.No, edit wars have nothing to do with who the battling editors are and/or their relation to the page prior to war.There are lots of ressource on the web, describing what a _wiki_ edit war is, like: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?EditWar
I know what an edit war is, thanks anyway.
If the restriction was justified, why did I, the person who would use it the most, didn't see the justification?I certainly can't understand (of course, I would understand if the first edit restriction was justified).The restriction was justified.
Once your edit was reverted, you should not have reverted again (see [1]).
Why? [1] is about something different (page restoration/deletion).
You already said this, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2009/04/msg00021.htmlInstead, you should have discussed about your changes. BTW, writing in a wiki is like coding, it is a good idea to "split your patch" so other people understand what you do and why you do it.
[1] http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DeleteOnceRestoreOnce