Re: Mistake on the Lenny installation manual
* Frans Pop <email@example.com> [2010-02-26 14:34:58 CET]:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Can't it also get fixed in the branch for the lenny installation
> > manual and get fixed there? People will keep installing lenny for a
> > while, so having correct lenny install manuals should be of interest, or
> > do I miss something here?
> No, you're not missing anything. But I don't really see the point of doing
> a full upload of the manual for just this one issue. Especially as exactly
> the same link also occurs in the Woody and Sarge versions of the manual,
> which are also still published on the website.
Woody and Sarge aren't supported anymore and archived, that's an
extremely flawed argument. For lenny we just had point release not too
> Also, an upload of the manual to stable would *not* automatically result in
> version on the website getting rebuilt.
Right, I never asked about an upload of the manual to stable. I had the
impression that the version on the website is built from a VCS directly,