Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2009, 11:07 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen: > when I read this yesterday, I was too shocked to write a non harsh mail. /me > tries again. when I read this now, I am too shocked to write a non harsh mail. /me tries anyway. > On Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2009, Simon Paillard wrote: > > > why not simply change the css to not use that experimental css property? > > Because the blue box would look like square even on gecko web browsers : > > So now (the link has been removed) we cripple our website because we use a > design feature which is understood by <30% of the browser population in use > (and which can be easily implemented in a way that it's understood by 100%). ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Which would exactly be? You know, if it's so obvious to you the rest of us is just dumb to not think about it? > I'm not impressed. (Rather I think this speaks poorly of our website once > again.) I'm not impressed. (Rather I think this speaks poorly of our overall discussion style once again.) Sorry, Rhonda
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil