[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Old information at http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/errata



On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:02:58AM +0100, Ralph Lindner wrote:
> > man sollte auf der Seite vielleicht darauf hinweisen, dass weder Point 
> > Releases noch Security-Updates mehr für woody erreichbar sind.
> > Die Hinweise auf dieser Seite sind wohl veraltet, zumindest erreiche ich 
> > unter den angegebenen Adressen weder security-updates noch point-releases.
> 
> Ralph suggests to add a note that point releases and security updates
> for Woody are no longer accessible. He thinks the page is outdated as
> the links seem not to work for him.

Ralph probably forgot a "apt-get update" but nevertheless the following
APT source does no longer exist:

deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US proposed-updates/non-US main contrib non-free

Does anyone know a mirror for Woody and other (older?) systems?

Also the usage of
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian proposed-updates main contrib non-free
in hour site is bad as it refers now probably to Etch whereas it referred
in the past to Woody. We should use code names instead.

Where are currently proposed updates for Woody?
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/ lists sarge-proposed-updates/,
etch-proposed-updates/, lenny-proposed-updates/, oldstable-proposed-updates/
but no woody-proposed-updates/ or oldoldstable-proposed-updates/ :-)

Even http://archive.debian.org/dists/ misses woody-proposed-updates/ but
provides {hamm,potato,slink}-proposed-updates.

> Would it make sense to update some links to old releases to point to
> http://archive.debian.org/? Probably not ...

Oops, Ralph convinced me that it is important to update even old release
pages as Woody may still be used in production (even I have still such a
old system).

I will try to update the pages but need at least woody-proposed-updates ...

Jens


Reply to: