On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 09:05:38AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > Indeed. Moreover, the only advantage of svn seems to be that to an > > end-user, it looks very similar as cvs. > > It also supports symbolic links, proper file/directory renaming, etc. > All in all, svn is way better than cvs for almost everything. None of this features is used or needed AFAIK for the WWW repository. Losing all the CVS history and having to update all the tools for no real gain seems like a major drawback to me. I think we should tackle this in two steps: 1- move the CVS over to Alioth, change all build tools that depend on gluck so that they pull from the Alioth CVS. 2- consider which VCS is best and switch to it, switching all tools which are VCS-dependant Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature