Re: Possible error in check_trans.pl
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Rumen Krastev wrote:
> > The translation header should mention the translated English revision, so
> > it should have been 1.25 probably. As English revision 1.1 is more than 6
> > months old, the file would be completely outdated and as such is removed.
>
> You mean that the script doesn't compare dates of the modifications, instead
> it reads the header and if the header says i'm v1.1 or there is no such
> header it decides that this file is outdate? Bizzare :-/
> If it works like that, there is a bug for me - definitely.
No, it compares dates, but in your case djpig added a translation header
saying that you translated revision 1.1 and that revision is way older
than 6 months so irrespective of how old your translation is, this
translation would be very outdated and so it was deleted. The only problem
was thus that the revision number was 1.1 instead of 1.25.
> > You can off course add it again.
> Yeap, and what happens when one day this script purge 20 or even more files
> in different directories? This would decrease the motivation of every
> translator :-/
You should add a translation header in every translated file with the
right revision number (that of the english page of course).
> > So, I don't think there is a bug in the script...
> But I do
Still??
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: