On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 20:03 -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > > Index: vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml,v > > retrieving revision 1.5 > > diff -u -u -r1.5 transcript.wml > > --- vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 18 Jan 2003 13:21:53 -0000 1.5 > > +++ vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:09 -0000 > > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ > > Generally, better communication should prevent this sort of thing though - and I think that's very important. > > > > <p><b>Ben:</b> > > - I think I differ in my assesment of the "new maintainer fallout" in that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure... > > + I think I differ in my assessment of the "new maintainer fallout" in that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure... > > <br><b>Ben:</b> > > after talking to a couple of people involved with new maintainer I was shown that they were basically asking for help quite a while before they decided to close > > asking for help indirectly, but still, they asked > > I don't want to change quotes, so I didn't fix this. Matt, you can probably replace "assesment" with "[assessment]" safely.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part