Re: Typos in web sites
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Index: News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -u -r1.3 index.wml
> --- News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml 29 Apr 2002 07:02:00 -0000 1.3
> +++ News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:07 -0000
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
> Collins</a> and
> <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0102/msg00018.html";>Branden
> Robinson</a> have posted platforms so far. Ben listed some specific issues
> -he wants to deal with if if elected, including "<i>allowing new maintainers
> +he wants to deal with if elected, including "<i>allowing new maintainers
> with less privileges</i>", QA, and a more pro-active stance on security.
> Branden, in turn, listed some issues including a more formalized delegation
> process, keeping track of unmaintained packages and MIA developers, and
Already fixed.
> Index: ports/alpha/sys_types.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/ports/alpha/sys_types.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -u -u -r1.10 sys_types.wml
> --- ports/alpha/sys_types.wml 6 Mar 2004 01:25:08 -0000 1.10
> +++ ports/alpha/sys_types.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
> </tr>
>
> <tr>
> -<td>AlphaSever 800 5/333...500</td>
> +<td>AlphaServer 800 5/333...500</td>
>
> <td>Corelle <i>(Noritake family)</i></td>
> <td>Yes</td>
Fixed.
> Index: security/faq.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/faq.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.36
> diff -u -u -r1.36 faq.wml
> --- security/faq.wml 27 Feb 2004 23:56:19 -0000 1.36
> +++ security/faq.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
>
> <toc-add-entry name=missing>I've seen DSA 100 and DSA 102, now where is DSA 101?</toc-add-entry>
> <p>A: Several vendors (mostly of GNU/Linux, but also of BSD
> - deriviates) coordinate security advisories for some incidents and
> + derivates) coordinate security advisories for some incidents and
> agree to a particular timeline so that all vendors are able to
> release an advisory at the same time. This was decided in order to
> not discriminate some vendors that need more time (e.g. when the
I changed it to "derivatives", since neither of the others is in
the dictionary.
> Index: security/index.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/index.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.69
> diff -u -u -r1.69 index.wml
> --- security/index.wml 3 Mar 2004 19:16:32 -0000 1.69
> +++ security/index.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> the <a href="#DSAS">Debian Security Advisories</a> are
> <a href="cve-compatibility">CVE-Compatible</a> and Debian is represented
> in the Board of the
> -<a href="http://oval.mitre.org/";>Open Vulnerability Assesment Language</a> project.
> +<a href="http://oval.mitre.org/";>Open Vulnerability Assessment Language</a> project.
> </P>
>
> <H2>Keeping your Debian system secure</H2>
Already fixed.
> Index: security/2003/dsa-324.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/2003/dsa-324.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -u -r1.5 dsa-324.wml
> --- security/2003/dsa-324.wml 21 Jul 2003 15:48:18 -0000 1.5
> +++ security/2003/dsa-324.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:09 -0000
> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
> <li> The SPNEGO dissector could segfault while parsing an invalid
> ASN.1 value.
> <li> The RMI dissector handled strings improperly
> + as these modules are not present.</p>
> </ul>
>
> -<p>as these modules are not present.</p>
>
> <p>For the stable distribution (woody) these problems have been fixed in
> version 0.9.4-1woody5.</p>
Fixed.
> Index: vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -u -r1.5 transcript.wml
> --- vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 18 Jan 2003 13:21:53 -0000 1.5
> +++ vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:09 -0000
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
> Generally, better communication should prevent this sort of thing though - and I think that's very important.
>
> <p><b>Ben:</b>
> - I think I differ in my assesment of the "new maintainer fallout" in that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure...
> + I think I differ in my assessment of the "new maintainer fallout" in that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure...
> <br><b>Ben:</b>
> after talking to a couple of people involved with new maintainer I was shown that they were basically asking for help quite a while before they decided to close
> asking for help indirectly, but still, they asked
I don't want to change quotes, so I didn't fix this.
--
Matt Kraai kraai@ftbfs.org http://ftbfs.org/
Reply to: