[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages.d.o - what has been and what could be



On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:38:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:07:55PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > If you mail, don't forget CC: to grius@debian.org
> 
> o.k., done this time
> 
> > about main: 
> >   Now we translate only main. I will add contrib and non-free in future
> > 
> > about sid: 
> >   The server have translated descriptions from potato, woody, sarge and
> >   sid. But now I make only Translation files for sid. If you need more,
> >   ask and I will change this.
> 
> What about the different architectures? The files currently only
> contain i386 description translations (?) 

yes, now. But it should not be a big problem to add
packages/descriptions from !i386 Packages files...

> Will the other translations go in the same files? 

yes

> If yes, how will you handle packages like gcc that have different
> descriptions for different archs?

This is not a real problem. We use md5sums as keys in the Translation
files. If a package have different descriptions for different archs,
this different descriptions also will have different md5sums.

Gruss
Grisu
-- 
Michael Bramer  -  a Debian Linux Developer      http://www.debsupport.de
PGP: finger grisu@db.debian.org  -- Linux Sysadmin   -- Use Debian Linux
Jaja. Die Heisenbergsche Unschaerferelation soll nur die Rechenfehler
der Simulationshardware verdecken.
  -- lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) ueber simulierte Realitaet

Attachment: pgpSm4zCvF96Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: