[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#158787: marked as done (www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line)



Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:30:47 +0200
with message-id <20020830113047.GD730@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#158787: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2002 20:40:24 +0000
>From noel@debian.org Thu Aug 29 15:40:24 2002
Return-path: <noel@debian.org>
Received: from p508ea5b5.dip.t-dialin.net (controller.domain.lan) [80.142.165.181] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17kW5Y-0001G6-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:40:24 -0500
Received: from neo.domain.lan (neo.domain.lan [192.168.74.10])
	by controller.domain.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B5AC81F06; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:27:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Noel Koethe <noel@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:31:39 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20020829202730.B5AC81F06@controller.domain.lan>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29
Severity: normal

Hello,

the deb lines at "Point releases"

  # proposed additions for a 3.0 point release
  deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/
  deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US dists/proposed-updates/

doesn't work. apt return a 404.

neuro told me on IRC that the URLs are outdated but I have
no idea whats the correct lines.:(

thx.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux neo 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 158787-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2002 11:27:01 +0000
>From joy@gkvk.hr Fri Aug 30 06:27:00 2002
Return-path: <joy@gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17kjvY-0004LG-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 06:27:00 -0500
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17kjzD-0000UI-00
	for <158787-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:30:47 +0200
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:30:47 +0200
To: 158787-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#158787: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line
Message-ID: <20020830113047.GD730@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <[🔎] 20020829202730.B5AC81F06@controller.domain.lan> <[🔎] 2002-08-30_09.33.20@alfie.ist.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 2002-08-30_09.33.20@alfie.ist.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
Delivered-To: 158787-done@bugs.debian.org

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:33:24AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > the deb lines at "Point releases"
> > 
> >   # proposed additions for a 3.0 point release
> >   deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/
> >   deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US dists/proposed-updates/
> > 
> > doesn't work. apt return a 404.
> > 
> > neuro told me on IRC that the URLs are outdated but I have
> > no idea whats the correct lines.:(
> 
>  I am using the following:
> 
> deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian-non-US/ woody-proposed-updates/non-US main contrib non-free
> 
>  I am not sure if the work similar with http.us.d.o and non-us.d.o (but
> should) and if we usually add contrib and non-free to the sugguestions,
> too.

Based on this, the layout of the directories, and the README file in the
first mentioned location, I've updated the page.

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Reply to: