[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Debian Dicts, was: Finally: a Linuxtag report



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Am 17.07.2005 um 16:36 schrieb Meike Reichle:

I've shortly talked to Jutta about this and it seems packaging might get a bit difficult since she's concerned with a lot of other things, so someone
else might have to do it.

I am already working on that. But there are still problems getting the dictd files work witth dictd, which understands utf8 files now but has changed the file format and there is no description available - - all in the dictd source code. The woody version of dictd did not work with utf8 files, but serpento did. Serpento on the other hand seems not to be developed any longer.

Files for dict server created by the new version of makdictutf8.pl now can be converted for usage with dictd using dictfmt and makedictutf8.pl is fully working with perl 5.8, which was another issue. If anybody wants to help with figuring out the specs for the files dictd can be fed with, that would make things easier for me (and maybe for others creating or packaging dicts, too).

So help is needed for:
1. reading the dictd source code to make me able to write specs for the file format and make the changes in makedictutf8. 2. testers for languages like punjabi, bulgarian or not yet added languages like Vientamese, Japanese or chinese.
3. last not least: translators translating the raw dicts.

However, adding them to debian.org should be
easier and I would very much recommend doing so!!

Debian has not dict server running. So there can be the web pages only. The best place might be the doc tree. Maybe, I find someone who wants to include the dicts there, when I have solved the problems mentioned.

greetings

Jutta

- -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http://witch.muensterland.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkLbc0sACgkQOgZ5N97kHkc3DwCcDzZ2q3zLQTd42FoiGz7Xnzlj
yQYAoI+GyD/CIWuiwx47Eqt8cYgpuRVc
=Sh4s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: