Re: DPL and DW meeting conflict
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Erinn Clark wrote:
:: Seriously, don't worry about this.
:: Fellow DW people, what say ye? Our options, as I see
:: them, are:
:: a) Reschedule our meeting.
:: b) Go ahead with the meeting as planned.
:: The benefits to (a) are:
:: - No one will be too busy thinking about the DPL debate
:: - We have more time to think of a topic (which we still
:: don't have)
:: The benefits to (b) are:
:: - People will be on IRC already so (hopefully) they can
:: be shuffled over to the DPL debate. This is sort of
:: directed at people who don't tend be be on IRC all the
:: time or are somewhat new to Debian and maybe weren't
:: considering showing up for that.
:: - We get it over with. :-P
:: IMO, option (a) is the better choice, but let's try to
:: get some consensus then figure it out.
I vote for (a), but AFAIK, we only need this if the
date/time for DPL Debate remains. What about something like:
IF DPL Debate happens on March 19th D-W Meeting changes.
ELSE we keep D-W Meeting date.
:) My 0.02.
// Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <email@example.com>
// GUD-PR / DUG-PR || http://www.debian-pr.org
// GUD-BR / DUG-BR || http://www.debian-br.org
// Debian Project || http://www.debian.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----