Am 30.11.2012 11:38, schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
That's disappointing. The idea of the package being "prboom-plus" really rankles with me, e.g. imagine if bonnie++ was "bonnie-plus-plus", libstdc++6 libstdc-plus-plus-6 etc. However packaging practicalities are important. Let me look over your commits today and then I'll get back to you whether I'm happy to rename it or not.
I see your point, but the projects you mention do indeed call themselves with a '+' character, whereas in prboom{+,-plus} I found inconsistent use with a precedence towards the '-plus' variant:
$ grep -ir 'prboom+' prboom+/* | wc -l 30 $ grep -ir 'prboom-plus' prboom+/* | wc -l 246 - Fabian