Bug#690905: freedoom: Prboom Plus should be used instead of Prboom
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> I have currently started improving the packaging a bit and found the
> package name really confusing and distracting. Could we please
> rename the package to "prboom-plus" just as upstream calls the
> project itself? We could, of course, keep the symlinks to "prboom+"
> binary and manpage, but as a Debian package name I find it really
> unsuitable.
That's disappointing. The idea of the package being "prboom-plus"
really rankles with me, e.g. imagine if bonnie++ was "bonnie-plus-plus",
libstdc++6 libstdc-plus-plus-6 etc. However packaging practicalities
are important. Let me look over your commits today and then I'll
get back to you whether I'm happy to rename it or not.
Reply to: