Bug#654924: Fwd: Re: TigerVNC 1.0.90 src debs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Joachim's work is much better than the hacked packages I have put
together. Sorry I still haven't been able to use this as a base to
provide better/newer versions. The reason is that despite a number of
important shortcomings in the packages I have put out, they do what I
need them to do... so there isn't much of an incentive for me to spend
more time fighting with packaging issues.
You probably want to keep the tigervnc list informed so that the
newer/better packages can be linked from their homepage instead of mine.
Cheers
Antoine
On 02/22/2012 04:50 AM, Joachim Falk wrote:
> Hey Mike,
>
> fyi, regarding your ITP for tigervnc. I don't think that Antoine
> has done anything in this regard. But you might ask or use my
> package as basis for yours. I have already applied some fixes from
> redhat ontop of the original tigervnc sources. The stuff is all
> versioned via git so you can tell what changes I have applied.
>
> Regards, Joachim
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654924
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: TigerVNC 1.0.90
> src debs Datum: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 20:10:30 +0700 Von: Antoine Martin
> <antoine@nagafix.co.uk> An: Joachim Falk <joachim.falk@gmx.de>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this, I was meant to do this ages ago and really
> dropped the ball on this one. I'll take a look asap.
>
> Cheers Antoine
>
> On 09/17/2011 07:40 PM, Joachim Falk wrote:
>> Am 23.05.2011 10:19, schrieb Antoine Martin:
>>> Hi Joachim,
>
>>> Joachim Falk wrote:
>>>> Dear Antoine, you provide some binary debs
>>>>
>>>> "http://winswitch.org/dists/squeeze/main/";
>>>>
>>>> for debian-squeeze for TigerVNC 1.0.90. However, I seem to
>>>> be incapable of finding the corresponding src debs for the
>>>> binaries. Could you point me in the correct direction? I
>>>> want to tinker a bit with the built options for Xvnc4.
>
>>> I am afraid that those builds are hacked using bash scripts
>>> and are probably wrong. See the recent discussion about how
>>> Xvnc should be build against the host headers rather than using
>>> the build-xorg script which is in the source. I keep meaning to
>>> do things right, but I just don't have the time at present...
>> Hi Antoine,
>
>> it took me some time, but I finally got around to make some debs
>> of my own. They should build tigervnc properly. Maybe you can use
>> them as basis for some semi official version.
>
>> http://xiao.jfalk.de/~joachim/tigervnc <= Look here
>
>> Cheers, Joachim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk9Esk4ACgkQGK2zHPGK1rufUgCffaUR/uNbb5nOrcvx1jFcScpH
0NoAniLKA96cIlcYdpp1k+pYnJTFlxG3
=icof
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: