Bug#654924: Fwd: Re: TigerVNC 1.0.90 src debs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey Mike,
fyi, regarding your ITP for tigervnc. I don't think that Antoine has
done anything in this regard. But you might ask or use my package as
basis for yours. I have already applied some fixes from redhat ontop
of the original tigervnc sources. The stuff is all versioned via git
so you can tell what changes I have applied.
Regards,
Joachim
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654924
- -------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: TigerVNC 1.0.90 src debs
Datum: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 20:10:30 +0700
Von: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
An: Joachim Falk <joachim.falk@gmx.de>
Hi,
Thanks for this, I was meant to do this ages ago and really dropped
the ball on this one.
I'll take a look asap.
Cheers
Antoine
On 09/17/2011 07:40 PM, Joachim Falk wrote:
> Am 23.05.2011 10:19, schrieb Antoine Martin:
>> Hi Joachim,
>
>> Joachim Falk wrote:
>>> Dear Antoine, you provide some binary debs
>>>
>>> "http://winswitch.org/dists/squeeze/main/";
>>>
>>> for debian-squeeze for TigerVNC 1.0.90. However, I seem to be
>>> incapable of finding the corresponding src debs for the
>>> binaries. Could you point me in the correct direction? I want
>>> to tinker a bit with the built options for Xvnc4.
>
>> I am afraid that those builds are hacked using bash scripts and
>> are probably wrong. See the recent discussion about how Xvnc
>> should be build against the host headers rather than using the
>> build-xorg script which is in the source. I keep meaning to do
>> things right, but I just don't have the time at present...
> Hi Antoine,
>
> it took me some time, but I finally got around to make some debs of
> my own. They should build tigervnc properly. Maybe you can use them
> as basis for some semi official version.
>
> http://xiao.jfalk.de/~joachim/tigervnc <= Look here
>
> Cheers, Joachim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=9qVt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: