[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Python buildd (was Re: let me help you with progressing bikesheds)

On 2018-03-22 22:31 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2018-03-07 12:08, Hector Oron wrote:
> > 2018-03-07 12:01 GMT+01:00 Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>:

> To do more tests I agree that we should deploy it on more buildds. For
> *this phase*, I believe enabling lingering and deploying it by hand is
> the best. Is it something acceptable?

Anything is OK for _testing_, but I think it's always been a problem
that we don't use packaged code to do our build infrastrucutre,
because this makes it very hard to reproduce. And thre are lots of
reasons why people do want to have their own build infra of various

So if we are having a re-arrange, I think we should try very hard to
use our own mechanisms and package this just like we package
everything else, not because it's easier for us, but because it's
easier for everyone else.

Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: