[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#886450: tracker.debian.org: Separate subscription for official and non-official architectures builds

On 16/01/18 09:41, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 15.01.2018 12:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Hence my suggestion (to which I must add X-Debian-Package now):
>>  X-Debian: buildd.debian.org
>>  X-Debian-Package: firefox
>>  X-Debian-Architecture: powerpc
>>  X-Debian-Suite: sid
>>  X-Debian-State: failed
>> I have just taught tracker.debian.org to recognize the above so you can
>> immediately drop the setting of "X-Distro-Tracker*" provided that you set
>> X-Debian to buildd.debian.org and X-Debian-Package to the source package name.
> I have added this now and I'll monitor throughout the day if it actually
> works as expected.
> I didn't do pochu's suggestion of official/unofficial yet, mostly
> because that list isn't technically known to the script and it seems we
> already skip notifications for the following architectures:
> ignore_arches: mips64el hurd-i386 alpha hppa m68k powerpcspe ppc64 sh4
> sparc64 x32

Can we drop mips64el from that list? It's been a supported architecture for a while.

> So a solution here would be to just mirror the actual list of
> unsupported ports there, if we want that. But sending out new
> notifications for these would be a big behavior change (i.e. by
> definition it should only send out mails for supported ones).

Makes sense. Those could be sent as well, but filtered by the tracker service to
a different keyword, so the user can choose whether to subscribe to those or not.

> I suppose the actual delta would be +kfreebsd-amd64 +kfreebsd-i386 +ia64
> +powerpc, right?



Reply to: