[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#886450: tracker.debian.org: Separate subscription for official and non-official architectures builds

On 14/01/18 17:42, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 01:58 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Jan 2018, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>>> I'm putting debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org in copy to hear their thoughts
>>>> about this. Do you think it's possible to add headers like:
>>>>     X-Debian: buildd.debian.org
>>>>     X-Debian-Architecture: powerpc
>>>>     X-Debian-Suite: sid
>>>>     X-Debian-State: failed
>>> this is trivial. We can lift anything that's in the body of the email to
>>> the headers.
>> Great, that will solve the short term problem of Mike and will also enable
>> the package tracker to better filter emails if we want to follow up on his
>> suggestion.
>> Will you do it soon or is there a place where we should record this
>> wishlist?
> I don't mind just doing it. I just looked at the current code and it
> already sets this:
>     msg['X-Distro-Tracker-Package'] = buildlog.package
>     msg['X-Distro-Tracker-Keyword'] = 'build'
> Since 2015. And for some reason I didn't spot that when I replied
> originally. Given that, what about adding
> X-Distro-Tracker-Build-{Architecture,State,Suite}? And do you still need
> the X-Debian in this case?

Probably add one more header, -Architecture-Support (or whatever), with possible
values 'release' and 'port'. That way users that want to filter non-release
architectures don't need to keep updating their filter list.


Reply to: