[ Please Cc me on replies for no good reason. ] On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 01:20:12PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > let me bump this again, as I have not received a reply. Which one of > these is it going to be? > > A. You want the buildd graphs on buildd.debian.org proper. For > that, tell me where I should put it. I’ll happily beef it up to > not special-case the Haskell packages. > B. You don’t want the feature on buildd.debian.org proper, but you > also don’t want to enable ~-dirs. In that case, would mirroring > the wb-database in read-only mode to, say, people.d.o or > alioth.d.o be an option? > C. You simply add that one symbolic link again and reproduce the > status quo of before the grieg breakage. > > Note that I do “we are going to ignore you and your work until you give > up” or “we are going to tell you that we don’t want your work to exist > at all” is not an acceptable way to treat contributors in Debian. True. I never saw these graphs before today. But I have been quite busy as well. As KiBi said the intention was to merge such improvements into Debian infrastructure as we had enough pages link to buildd/~username in the past. (I would've been ok with machine.d.o/~username for temporary arrangements, but alas DSA wasn't.) Your script looks reasonably easy that it can just be included in the normal tree. Would it be possible that you place a tiny git repository with the script and its javascript dependencies in your home, so that we can continuously pull from it? Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature