Re: gb ants_1.9.2+svn680.dfsg-4 . mips mipsel s390
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >gb ants_1.9.2+svn680.dfsg-4 . mips mipsel s390
> I'm not sure that giving back ants on s390 would bring anything
> good. It has been failing to build there since a few revisions.
and the sign is worrisome regarding my ability to overcome the problem:
"virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory"
that was on zappa -- is there any other build box with more VMEM avail?
> For mipsel, -3 also failed with the same error.
it might indeed be a memory issue but message was a bit different:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ants&arch=mipsel&ver=1.9.2%2Bsvn680.dfsg-3&stamp=1331621632
c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
or am I looking at incorrect spot?
> You might want to
> investigate the ICE on a porter box and/or try a difference
> compiler.
yeah -- would be "fun"... I am afraid though that it might not replicate
(I think I even committed a crime ones for ants or openmeeg by manual bin
upload after having it built on one of the porter boxes). but ok -- will
request access for ants on mipsel...
> For mips, -3 also failed with the same error/test. Same remark as
> for mipsel.
;-)
but so far it just looks like insufficient resources on all of them...
may be I should first check with the release team first either they would
reinstate both openmeeg and ants in wheezy if these FTBFS would get resolved...
otherwise it would be a pain for nothing
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: