Re: Dep-wait for petsc

[Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>]

* Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> [2009-04-04 11:55]:

> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 10:24:59AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > * Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> [2009-04-03 23:11]:
> > 
> > > > > This one too:
> > > > > 
> > > > > dw petsc_3.0.0.dfsg-1 . hppa . -m 'babel-1.2.0 (>= 1.2.0.dfsg-7)'
> > > > 
> > > > babel-1.2.0 is arch all, so is already available on hppa.
> > 
> > Yes, I knew this but babel-1.2.0 comes from the babel source, which is not
> > yet built for hppa.  Maybe we should change the dep-wait to:
> > 
> > dw petsc_3.0.0.dfsg-1 . hppa . -m 'libsidl1.2.0 (>= 1.2.0.dfsg-7)'
> > 
> > since libsidl1.2.0 is one of the binary arch-dependent packages built
> > from the babel source.  This one is lacking for hppa, currently.
> 
> The Build-Depends has:
> babel-1.2.0 | babel [!arm !alpha !s390 !hppa], libsidl-dev (>=
> 1.2.0.dfsg-5) [!arm !alpha !s390 !hppa]
> 
> libsidl-dev depends on libsidl1.2.0, but it's not needed for hppa.
> 
> Maybe the build depedency for babel-1.2.0 is also missing this
> arch exclusion?
> 
> And it seems to be available on s390, and arm isn't used anymore,
> so maybe it should get changed to:
> babel-1.2.0 [!alpha !hppa] | babel [!alpha !hppa], libsidl-dev (>=
> 1.2.0.dfsg-5) [!alpha !hppa]

Yes, this is also a possibility.  I am Cc:ing this message to the petsc
maintainer.

-- 
Rafael