Hi,
On 11/15/23 15:22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> The Debian project however notes that not enough emphasis has been
>> employed in all parts of these regulations to clearly exonerate Free
>> and Open Source Software Projects from being subject to the same
>> liabilities as commercial products
> I find this part a bit ambiguous. When GitLab or Proxmox or RedHat sells
> services around a free software product, I think it's OK if they are
> covered by this regulation. Maybe it would be better with
> s/Projects/Organizations/?
That is exactly why I think this is dangerous: I want GitLab and Proxmox
to be responsible for what they release, but it is very difficult to
draw a line between their offering and what Microsoft is doing by paying
for systemd development while they are also selling Azure cloud.
Why should there be a borderline between that? Microsoft has to be responsible
for what they are selling in the Azure cloud (pre-defined images), regardless of
the systemd developer work.