Re: Question to all candidates: rotation on positions of power
Hi Charles,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 21:51:44 +0900
Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> wrote:
> I expect a term limit to increase rotation on the positions of power,
> with the following benefits:
>
> - reduce the risk of burn-out of the delegates,
>
> - motivate fresh people to have the ambition to serve in these
> positions, because it becomes predictable when driving seats become
> available,
>
> - motivate the current delegates to put their own replacement as part
> of their planning, making us more resilient to sudden (or chronic)
> unavailabilities,
>
> - increase the chances that those of us who keep a strong involvement
> over many years diversify their experience, knitting our different
> subgroups into a more harmonious society.
>
> - increase our chances that challenging ideas accepted.
Okay, thank you. I agree with all of above.
> In brief, everything good (and everything bad) that "more turnover" is
> expected to bring in most of social structures where we evolve outside
> Debian.
"Mixing" people is necessary to maintain its organization.
And don't forget, "just only limiting" is not mixing. With "fresh blood"
is what we want :) Then we need more information about current status
of those works, we ask them to give "bits from" mails.
--
Hideki Yamane <henrich@iijmio-mail.jp>
Reply to: