Re: Question to all candidates: Ongoing/future legal projects
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 7:56 PM Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I have to say I feel really troubled by reading this. It's hard to believe that
> a candidate for DPL addresses a legitimate and quite sensitive question with
> such a rhetorical passive-aggressive borderline-bullying response.
> Well, at least it makes the voting easier for me.
It was not a rhetorical question. Molly posted here three times
regardless of any sensitivity. Each time I answered reluctantly, and
in the abstract.
After Steve McIntire's push to provide financial assistance, however,
I realized that Molly's question may have been more than hypothetical.
With my counter-question I hoped to clarify her request, because my
answer would change.
I would be prepared to provide some continuity of government, even if
I personally disagree with actions taken before I was elected. (For
example, to preserve the priority of a claim.)
The degree depends on each case—again making any details ineligible to
In view of Molly's later assertion that she "didn't mention financial
assistance or pursuing harassment claims in court,"  I am no longer
sure how to understand her original question. 
I am sorry I was unable to provide a satisfactory answer.