Re: Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification

[Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>]

Hi Judit,

it might be a bit late for a change now, but at first I had some
difficulties parsing the last added sentence in 4.2:

Judit Foglszinger <urbec@riseup.net> writes:

> <h3>4.2. Procedure</h3>
> @@ -228,9 +246,10 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.</cite></p>
>     <p>
>        Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes, tallies, and
>        results are not revealed during the voting period; after the
>        vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes {+cast in sufficient detail that anyone may verify the outcome of the election from the votes cast. The+}
> {+       identity of a developer casting a particular vote is not made+}
> {+       public, but developers will be given an option to confirm their vote is included in the votes+} cast. 

I think it would be clearer to add "that" between "confirm" and "their":

{+       public, but developers will be given an option to confirm that their vote is included in the votes+} cast. 

Regards

Carsten