Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> wrote on 04/03/2022 at 12:03:22+0100: > [[PGP Signed Part:Signature made by expired key 0816B9E18C762BAD Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> ]] > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:42:51AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: >> Reaffirm public voting >> ====================== >> >> Since we can either have secret and intransparent voting, or we can have >> open and transparent voting, the project resolves to leave our voting >> system as it is. >> >> Rationale: >> >> The GR proposal for secret voting is silent on implenentation details, >> probably because secret and transparent voting is, well, impossible to >> achieve fully, so this GR is bound to a similar fate as the 'publish >> debian-private' vote, which was voted for and then was never implemented. >> >> A voting system which is transparent only to some, is undemocratic and >> will lead to few people in the know, which is diagonal to Debians goals >> of openness and transparency. >> >> And then, early 2022 is not the time for rushed changes like this, which >> is also why I explicitly want to see "keep the status quo" on the ballot, >> and not only as "NOTA", but as a real option. >> >> I'm seeking sponsors for this amendment to the current GR. > > > Assuming you meant this as "this ballot" instead of "this amendment" > (following the new GR flow), I sponsor this. > > > > If I were to add my thoughts: political GRs don't belong in Debian, > please take them elsewhere. For non-political votes there is no use > for private voting. Is init systems GR a political GR? I'm pretty sure some gave double thoughts before voting because of the shitstorm/flame that had happened before the vote. -- PEB
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature