[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reaffirm public voting



* Philip Hands: " Re: Reaffirm public voting" (Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:23:32 +0100):

> Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:03:22PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:  
> >> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:42:51AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:  
> >> > Reaffirm public voting
> >> > ======================
> >> > 
> >> > Since we can either have secret and intransparent voting, or we can have
> >> > open and transparent voting, the project resolves to leave our voting
> >> > system as it is.
> >> > 
> >> > Rationale:
> >> > 
> >> > The GR proposal for secret voting is silent on implenentation details,
> >> > probably because secret and transparent voting is, well, impossible to
> >> > achieve fully, so this GR is bound to a similar fate as the 'publish 
> >> > debian-private' vote, which was voted for and then was never implemented.
> >> > 
> >> > A voting system which is transparent only to some, is undemocratic and
> >> > will lead to few people in the know, which is diagonal to Debians goals
> >> > of openness and transparency.
> >> > 
> >> > And then, early 2022 is not the time for rushed changes like this, which
> >> > is also why I explicitly want to see "keep the status quo" on the ballot,
> >> > and not only as "NOTA", but as a real option. 
> >> > 
> >> > I'm seeking sponsors for this amendment to the current GR.  
> >> Assuming you meant this as "this ballot" instead of "this amendment"
> >> (following the new GR flow), I sponsor this.  
> >
> > yes, that's what I ment, thanks. Do I need to resent my mail now with this
> > change? :)  
> 
> I sponsor this.
> 
> While I may not end up voting for it as my first option, I think it
> deserves to be an explicit option, because I can imagine that no
> super-majority emerges in this vote, and if that happens then we will be
> able to draw rather different conclusions about the project consensus
> depending upon whether this option comes above or below NotA (and by how
> much).
> 
> Cheers, Phil.

I sponsor this as well.


-- 

    Mathias Behrle
    PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
    AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71  7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6

Attachment: pgpdYFnLfNfNZ.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP


Reply to: