Le dimanche 04 avril 2021 à 21:49:01+0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 11:29:58PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > I'd rather have a None of the Above default option all the time along > > with FD. It'd probably help. > > FD effectively is the same as "none of the above". > > You might believe that the subject is stupid and that the horse is dead > and we shop stop flogging it, but the fact that we got it to a vote in > the first place proves that there are people who disagree with you, and > they will translate NOTA winning into "we haven't found the right answer > yet, so let's try this again, for real this time". > > That's further discussion, just under a different name. I'd rather have > an option that is honest with everyone and declares what will in effect > happen. > > If you want an option that says "no, not now, not ever", you need to put > it on the ballot. To me there is a big difference in theory and semantically, but I agree that practically these are the same. IMHO, "None of the Above" => all ballot options are discarded. From there, either people want to keep discussing the matter and new ballot options should be proposed, or the GR becomes moot. FD => hey, for now people are not convinced enough to vote, let's redo a X weeks discussion. -- Pierre-Elliott Bécue GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528 F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2 It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature