Re: Draft proposal for resolution process changes
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> The scenario where this matters is this:
> 1. Vote starts. There is some controversy and discussion for a week and a
> half.
> 2. 12 days into the voting period one TC member is away or ill or
> otherwise unable to immediately respond.
> 3. Another TC member calls a vote, possibly immediately after making some
> last minute change to the ballot (which is allowed).
> 4. By the time the TC member who would object returns, either the timing
> for the mandatory vote has elapsed or, were the vote canceled, the
> mandatory vote would start again within a matter of hours.
A mischosen word made that hopelessly confusing. Point 1 is supposed to
start with "Proposal starts."
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: