On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 05:40:57PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I feel that the air in -vote has been getting very heavy in the last day
> or so, and I was quite happy that Sam opted to cut the pain short and go
> for a vote.
I (mostly) missed this part busy preparing an event...
> I agree that all the useful options seem to be on the ballot, and I look
> forward to see what comes out. I would prefer that we didn't start
> something that looks like meta-discussing options, and meta-discussing
> whether to meta-discuss options, and so on.
>
> Nitpicking on the constitutional process like this looks to me like an
> interesting move in some competitive board game. I would prefer to see
> less competition, and more cooperative focus on trying to make Policy
> unstuck while trying to keep pain to a minimum.
_
_ / |
_| |_| |
|_ _| |
|_| |_|
(+1)
IOW, a GR to overturn the GR to delay the GR about the GR is...
then, I also think all the useful options are on the table, but if Ian
has something to greatly improve option G, the latest of the available options,
very soon, I can see how we can still start voting on the 8th or 10th or
12th or whatever. Everybody who is interested to vote on this GR, and can
vote, will know about this GR and so either can vote early and enjoy the
holidays or enjoy the holidays, read as much background info as wanted
during/after and before the holidays and then vote. (or whenever this vote ends)
--
cheers,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature