On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 07:18:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Ordering > ======== > In order to save voters' time by making it possible to read proposals in > a more sensible order, I think they should be re-ordered as: > > Proposal E / Choice 5: Support for multiple init systems is Required > Proposal D / Choice 4: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress > Proposal A / Choice 1: Support for multiple init systems is Important > Proposal B / Choice 2: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives > Proposal C / Choice 3: Focus on systemd for init system and other facilities > > (or the reverse, which has the advantage of only permutating between > Sam's proposals, which might be more procedurally acceptable) I wholeheartly support this. (and the rest of what Lucas wrote here, but providing a sensible ordering is the most important bit of it. Thank you very much for this review, Lucas!) -- cheers, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature