[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Review of proposals

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 07:18:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Ordering
> ========
> In order to save voters' time by making it possible to read proposals in
> a more sensible order, I think they should be re-ordered as:
> Proposal E / Choice 5: Support for multiple init systems is Required
> Proposal D / Choice 4: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress
> Proposal A / Choice 1: Support for multiple init systems is Important
> Proposal B / Choice 2: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives
> Proposal C / Choice 3: Focus on systemd for init system and other facilities
> (or the reverse, which has the advantage of only permutating between
> Sam's proposals, which might be more procedurally acceptable)
I wholeheartly support this.

(and the rest of what Lucas wrote here, but providing a sensible
ordering is the most important bit of it. Thank you very much for this
review, Lucas!)


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: