[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Procedural rangling

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:43:06AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes:
>     Kurt> I always struggle with trying to understand that part, but my
>     Kurt> current interpretation is different. The page shows the
>     Kurt> discussion perriod starting at the 19th, which is when Ian's
>     Kurt> proposal got enough sponsors.
> My understanding is that you believe any formal amendment achieving
> sufficient sponsors restarts the discussion period.
> You may also believe that a sponsor of a formal amendment accepting a
> change to that amendment resets the discussion period.
> I argue below that is inconsistent with the constitution and introduces
> significant strategic problems.

I already changed my mind. Like I said, I always struggle with it.

I'll try write something down of all the things I get confused
about later.


Reply to: