[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [draft] Draft text on Init Systems GR

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:24:44AM -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> The debate on systemd often turns into systemd vs. sysvinit because sysvinit is
> the working alternative right now. Unfortunately, this is a poor way
> to frame the
> debate. The reality is sytemd unit files are a really good idea, but systemd's
> hardware detection leaves much to be desired.
> You're going to get stuck with a lot of debates and really stupid support issues
> if you try to force systemd, because the hardware detection frequently outsmarts
> itself.
> Thus I filed an issue with systemd to separate out the early boot from the rest
> of systemd so that component can be replaced independently on deployed
> systems. No, I don't think they're actually willing to do it, but it
> would squash
> most/all of the real issues.
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/14058
For the record, this was closed with "afaics everything you are asking for
is already implemented, and pretty much documented".


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: