[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [draft] Draft text on Init Systems GR

Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

> You have got my intent right.  How about this as a suggested fix

>    patches which contribute support for other init
>    systems
>  + (with no substantial effect on systemd installations)
>    should be filed as bugs with severity `serious'

> leaving changes which *do* have such a substantial effect to be dealt
> with under 8.

> I say "on systemd *installations*" (emph. added) because obviously
> building two versions would have a substantial effect on build
> infrastructure etc.

> Do you think this is clearer and has the right effect ?

Yes, that looks great to me.

> I am open to other suggestions.  If we come to a conclusion on an
> improved wording here, I guess someone ought to formally propose it.  I
> guess it will fall to me to do that.

Let me know if it would be helpful for me to propose it.  Happy to do so.
I was also unclear on who can accept amendments to unaccepted amendments.

Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)              <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to: