Re: [draft] Draft text on Init Systems GR
Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> You have got my intent right. How about this as a suggested fix
> patches which contribute support for other init
> + (with no substantial effect on systemd installations)
> should be filed as bugs with severity `serious'
> leaving changes which *do* have such a substantial effect to be dealt
> with under 8.
> I say "on systemd *installations*" (emph. added) because obviously
> building two versions would have a substantial effect on build
> infrastructure etc.
> Do you think this is clearer and has the right effect ?
Yes, that looks great to me.
> I am open to other suggestions. If we come to a conclusion on an
> improved wording here, I guess someone ought to formally propose it. I
> guess it will fall to me to do that.
Let me know if it would be helpful for me to propose it. Happy to do so.
I was also unclear on who can accept amendments to unaccepted amendments.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>